Detect AI generated errors before publication.

AI tools and increasingly autonomous AI agents can hallucinate references, distort scientific evidence and generate claims that are not supported by their cited sources.

RefCheck detects these errors before they are published in scientific journals. It verifies citation integrity by checking that scientific claims are faithful to their sources and that references and bibliographic metadata are correct.

The challenge

AI is transforming how scientific manuscripts are produced

AI adoption is growing rapidly across research. The challenge for publishers is preventing false or distorted AI generated information from being published in scientific journals.

84%

of researchers surveyed reported using AI tools in their work in 2025, compared with 57% in 2024. Wiley Newsroom

Wiley ExplanAItions, 2025. Survey of 2,430 researchers conducted in August 2025.

Peer review does not routinely verify every citation

Reviewers assess scientific and methodological quality. They are not normally expected to open every cited paper and compare every statement with the primary source.

This creates a growing research integrity gap: scientific manuscripts can look credible and cite real literature while still containing information that the cited sources do not support.

Citation integrity

Two types of AI generated errors

Citation distortion

The cited paper is real, but the manuscript distorts what the source actually reports.

Bibliographic error

The cited work is hallucinated, incorrectly identified or contains incorrect metadata.

Citation distortion
References with bibliographic errors
Claude
Highest distortion
41%
6%
Elicit
40%
10%
Consensus
38%
30%
ChatGPT
Highest bibliographic error
22%
75%
What RefCheck does

One platform, two independent research integrity checks.

01 · Content

Citation fidelity

Does the cited source support what the manuscript claims?

RefCheck examines the manuscript claim by claim, retrieves the cited source and compares the statement with the source evidence.

02 · Metadata

Bibliographic integrity

Does the cited work exist and do the reference details match the official record?

Authors, year, journal, volume, pages, DOI and other metadata are checked against authoritative scholarly databases.

Citation fidelity example

The evidence is shown to the editor.

RefCheck report · content verification
Manuscript claim

“High consumption of ultra processed foods is associated with a 28% increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes.”

Primary source

“Participants in the highest consumption group showed a 36% higher risk of hypertension.”

RefCheck finding: the reference exists, but the manuscript misstates both the health outcome and the reported effect size.
Bibliographic integrity example

A real looking citation can still be wrong.

RefCheck report · metadata verification
Reference in the manuscript
Lu, X., Chen, Y., Patel, R., Kim, S. (2024). Predictive biomarkers in immunotherapy response for advanced NSCLC. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(3), 412–421.
Official record
Lu, X., Chen, Y., Patel, R., Kim, S. (2025). Predictive biomarkers in immunotherapy response for advanced NSCLC. Nature Medicine, 31(3), 412–421.
RefCheck finding: the cited year and journal do not match the official record.
Editorial workflow

From manuscript to report.

01

Upload

The editorial team uploads the manuscript received from the researcher.

02

Automatic verification

RefCheck runs citation fidelity and bibliographic integrity checks across the manuscript.

03

Editorial report

Editors receive the problematic claims, source evidence and bibliographic issues.

04

Editorial decision

The editor can continue the process, request corrections or take another editorial action.

Where RefCheck can be used

Built for different scholarly workflows.

RefCheck can operate as a standalone platform or integrate into existing editorial systems through an API.

Publishers and journals

Screen manuscripts during initial checks, peer review or before the final editorial decision.

Research institutions

Check manuscripts before submission and provide researchers with evidence linked findings.

Publishing technology providers

Embed citation verification into existing research and editorial platforms through an API.

Innovation

Understanding why AI gets scientific evidence wrong

We combine AI truthfulness with advanced methods from mechanistic interpretability and explainability to make AI systems safer and more trustworthy.

These methods help us understand how AI models work internally, how they “think”, and where and why they fail.

Mechanistic interpretability

What is the AI “thinking”?

We are testing sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to identify internal features that may help distinguish faithful from unfaithful scientific claims.

Explainability

Which internal signals can we trust?

Feature attribution, ablation and stability analysis help identify which internal signals contribute to reliable decisions and which may simply be noise.

Applied to research integrity, these methods offer a novel approach to a growing problem: increasingly autonomous AI systems that can generate false, misleading or incorrect scientific information. RefCheck uses these tools to understand and reduce those errors while strengthening the fight against paper mills and unreliable synthetic scientific content.

Impact

Reduce the impact of AI generated errors before publication.

Publishers are facing growing volumes of synthetic scientific content, paper mills, hallucinated references and claims that distort real evidence. Detecting these problems before publication can reduce corrections, retractions, editorial workload and further contamination of the scientific record.

Protect research integrity

Identify unsupported claims and incorrect references before they are published and repeated by researchers or future AI systems.

Reduce post publication damage

Detect problems before they result in corrections, retractions, reputational damage and additional editorial work.

Fight paper mills and synthetic content

Add an evidence verification layer to publisher efforts against manipulated, fabricated and industrially produced scientific manuscripts.

Reduce risks from autonomous AI agents

Detect unreliable scientific content produced by increasingly autonomous AI systems before it enters the publishing workflow.

RefCheck brings AI truthfulness into scientific publishing.

Before an AI generated error becomes part of the scientific record, verify the claim, verify the source and show the evidence.

Contact us
support@writewise.io
RefCheck · 2026